How much confusion. The only clear thing he wrote the Attorney State in its appeal to the Constitutional Court against the indictment of the former head of SISMI Nicola Pollari. Where he describes the "appreciable damage" brought the investigation of the magistrates in Milan on the CIA kidnapping of alleged terrorist Abu Omar "the image of the Italian Government, especially in the delicate and vital field of cooperation between States in the field of counterterrorism." It is claimed that "disclosure of the results of inquiry exposes the Italian services to the real risk of 'information ostracized' by the foreign counterparts, partly because the prosecutors in Milan have had" an attitude that is taut, whatever the cost, learning the news covered by state secrecy. "
The state secrets, is the point. The Berlusconi government had applied or not? In our opinion, should have done so because of the cooperation between the intelligence forces to fight against terrorism is one of the few cases where it is actually justified. But the Minister Di Pietro said today that Milan had acted "after asking if those investigations could be carried out and after that no one had vetoed. Because 'the truth' on state secrets must be honest: there is no written document to affix the secret. "
If Di Pietro is right to recognize that the government then moved with naive or superficial. Invece di giurare e spergiurare di nulla sapere e nulla pensare prima attraverso il ministro dei rapporti col Parlamento Carlo Giovanardi (gennaio 2004) poi attraverso una nota di Palazzo Chigi (11 maggio 2006) subito seguita da un’analoga assicurazione del ministro della Difesa Antonio Martino che il 12 maggio ribadisce "l'assoluta estraneità del Governo e del Sismi rispetto al sequestro di Abu Omar, rapimento che non coinvolge ad alcun titolo nè l'esecutivo nè il Servizio, nè direttamente nè indirettamente”, il Governo avrebbe dovuto fare rivendicare il suo ruolo in un’operazione volta a scongiurare nuovi attentati terroristici islamici contro l’Europa o gli Usa. Magari, secondo la prassi britannica, trincerandosi behind a no comment and, according to our local one, behind the state secrets. The only thing was that he should not allow to leave a free hand in the magistrates who have even managed to intercept phone calls between the intelligence chief and his closest collaborators. Transforming, as often happens to us, a very serious thing into a farce Italian.
0 comments:
Post a Comment