Give me straight. The problem is not concertone Andrea Rivera. It 's the concertone. Party as a demonstration in support of the union has turned into its opposite. The only service that now CGIL-CISL-UIL make the world of work is in fact the organization of the maxi-concert, which annually provides employment and wages in a sea of \u200b\u200bpeople, thanks to sponsorships and direct Rai3. And never mind if, as happened at the Sanremo Festival, which has eaten the Italian song, the Concertone ate the union. In return they get on the stage of cinqueminutini fifty live on television, and advertising is worth the expense. Meanwhile, the show evolves, it swells, s'involgarisce. Thanks Claudia Gerini, who has a little cry, claims to be changed after listening to Chuck Berry, says it all with the exclamation, Piazza San Giovanni has nothing to envy to the casino of the Riviera. It 's the Sanremo Festival in luogocomunismo, singer-songwriter of the Soviets, the Guevarist understood as political version of the cattlemen, namely frustration mixed with wishful thinking of me and I sing to the sound. Exceptionally, there shines a star, as happened last year with Vinicio Capossela, usually eight hours of music and mist ideological stench. But, as happens in San Remo, the official filming Concertone Rai make a media spotlight that can transform every appearance in divetto e ogni banalità in “dibbattito”. Di qui l’appello per un nuovo referendum: aboliamo il Concertone, o in alternativa Rai3. Tanto le botte rischiamo di pigliarle anche raccogliendo le firme solo sulla legge elettorale, come è successo a Segni in Piazza San Giovanni.
Quel che vorremmo davvero scongiurare è che una battuta scontata di un apprendista comico sul Papa e le ambiguità della Chiesa diventi caso politico e affare di Stato. Magari avranno ragione Alberto Melloni, Francesco Paolo Casavola, Antonio Socci: non si scherza col fuoco, e quando le Br minacciano, quando il capo dei Vescovi è sotto scorta, quando i cristiani sono massacrati nei paesi islamici, meglio rinunciare alla critica, all’ironia, the hoax. Maybe. I think the opposite: I do not care if the anti-Islamic cartoons are funny, what matters is that they are free to move. I do not care if Andrea Rivera made a joke that does not scratch or scratches too much, what matters is that say without fear of retaliation (el'accostamento terrorism is). I remain convinced that freedom is the best antidote to the risks related to it, and that terrorism will not make proselytes if creationism is pilloried.
On the other hand, the Church is now an opportunity to repair some methodological oversight. Let's say that someone commented threats to Monsignor Bagnasco: "It is deplorable that bishops and priests have been and are the object of violent malice in speech and action .. But if the clericalism is recognized as a right or a good thing no one should be surprised if the irrational and violent reactions increase. " Everyone is deemed unacceptable and rather hypocritical regret this and understand together. I would call justification. But if these concepts were drawn from a Vatican document on homosexuality, it would change our opinion? Yet in the "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons" signed on behalf of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, on 10 October 1986, exactly reads: "It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the subject of violent malice in speech or action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the Church's pastors wherever it occurs ... However, the proper reaction to crimes committed against homosexual persons can not lead in any way claim that the homosexual condition is not disordered. When such a claim is made and homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behavior to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the Church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational and violent reactions increase. "
I believe that in the face of terrorist threats (real ones, not those treated for convenience) the Church should ask themselves this way of dealing with violence against anyone who does not conform to its dictates. Deploring the violence but not surprising that those who want their freedom they fell victim, this is not well done.
0 comments:
Post a Comment